Pothecary Witham Weld Solicitors

Friday 18th May 2012
You are here  : Home Legal Updates
Legal Updates
Transfer of Undertakings (TUPE) Employment Law Update Print

On 6th April 2006 the new Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 came into force. They replaced the Regulations which had been in use since 1981 but their aim remains the same, namely to ensure that employment rights of all employees of a business being transferred, bind the new owner of a business in the same way as the previous owner was bound.

The 2006 Regulations require the old employer to give the new employer, employee liability information including employees’ ages and identities, salient employment terms; disciplinary, grievance, court or tribunal procedures involving staff during the previous two years together with information about prospective grievances or complaints and details of any collective agreement. Such information should be given not less than fourteen days before the business transfers and in default may be enforced by the transferee referring to an Employment Tribunal. The ET can then make an award of compensation to the new employer of some £500 per employee unless a smaller sum is regarded by the Tribunal as apt.

The 2006 Regulations make plain that they apply to all outsourcing situations as well as more clear cut transfers of businesses or parts.

The volume of case law on TUPE disputes since 1981 is large so a cautious view will be that if there is any doubt about whether TUPE 2006 applies to a particular set of circumstances, the assumption should be that it does.

If the transferring employer does not inform and consult with the employees who are transferring as the Regulations require, it will be liable with the new employer, to compensate affected staff even though the obligation to inform and consult with employees automatically passes to the new employer. In other words under TUPE 2006, the transferor employer will remain liable for the financial consequences along with the new transferee employer.

Dismissals and changes to employment terms remain unlawful under the 2006 Regulations, if connected with the transfer itself unless the employer can show that the reason is; “an economic, technical or organisational reason entailing changes in the workforce”; but a desire to standardise employment terms of new staff taken on as a result of TUPE with those of the transferee’s existing employees does not count as an economic technical or organisational reason.

The 2006 Regulations provide greater flexibility where potentially insolvent businesses are concerned but this aspect of TUPE has been criticised for vagueness.

 
Additional Topical Employment Law issues Print
Summary:
  1. Recruitment
    a. Duty to advertise job vacancies?
    b. Withdrawal of a job offer once accepted?
  2. Contracts of employment and written statement of particulars
  3. Changes to terms of employment
  4. Age discrimination update
  5. Post-termination restrictive covenants
  6. Summary of qualifying periods for employment rights

1. Recruitment

The general rule under English law is that, save in specified situations such as cases which involve the possibility of sex, race, disability or trade union related discrimination, an employer can lawfully refuse to employ a job applicant for any reason whatever.

a. Duty to advertise job vacancies?

There is no general duty on an employer to advertise job vacancies. The Employment Appeal Tribunal has ruled that neither the sex nor the race discrimination legislation impose a specific duty to advertise a position, although a failure to advertise might be taken into account in appropriate cases ICR 507, EAT).

It is unlawful to advertise a job vacancy in a way which indicates the job is only available to members of one of the sexes unless the job can lawfully be offered to members of one sex only or in a way which indicates that colour, race, nationality or ethnic origins will be determining factors unless the circumstance are such that it is lawful for colour, race etc to be used as determining factors for filling the vacancy. There are also advertising rules in relation to Disability Discrimination but in contrast to the equivalent sex and race discriminatory advertisement rules these allow positive discrimination in job advertisements.

Employers should be careful in requiring job-applicants to complete applications in hand-writing as this could amount to discrimination against some disabled people and should make it clear that other forms of application will be acceptable.

b. Withdrawal of a job offer once accepted?

An employment contract has the same legal implications as any other contract. Once an unconditional contract has been agreed it is binding on both parties and any failure to fulfill its terms by either party will be a breach of contract giving the other party the right to sue for any resulting loss.

2. Contracts of employment and written statement of particulars

A contract of employment exists as soon as an employee starts work. Starting work proves that they accept the terms and conditions offered by the employer. Both employer and employee are bound by the terms offered and accepted. Often the contract is verbally agreed and not written down.

Employees are however entitled by law to be given a written statement setting out the "main particulars" of their employment within two months of their start date.

The statement should contain:-

  • the names of the employer and employee,
  • the date when the employment began, and
  • the date on which the employee's period of continuous employment began

    The statement should also contain particulars, as at a specified date not more than seven days before the statement (or the installment containing them) is given, of:

  • the scale or rate of remuneration or the method of calculating remuneration,
  • the intervals at which remuneration is paid (that is, weekly, monthly or other specified intervals),
  • any terms and conditions relating to hours of work (including any terms and conditions relating to normal working hours),
  • any terms and conditions relating to any of the following:
    • entitlement to holidays, including public holidays, and holiday pay (the particulars given being sufficient to enable the employee's entitlement, including any entitlement to accrued holiday pay on the termination of employment, to be precisely calculated),
    • incapacity for work due to sickness or injury, including any provision for sick pay, and
    • pensions and pension schemes,
  • the length of notice which the employee is obliged to give and entitled to receive to terminate his contract of employment,
  • the title of the job which the employee is employed to do or a brief description of the work for which he is employed,
  • where the employment is not intended to be permanent, the period for which it is expected to continue or, if it is for a fixed term, the date when it is to end,
  • either the place of work or, where the employee is required or permitted to work at various places, an indication of that and of the address of the employer,
  • any collective agreements which directly affect the terms and conditions of the employment including, where the employer is not a party, the persons by whom they were made, and
  • where the employee is required to work outside the United Kingdom for a period of more than one month-
    • the period for which he is to work outside the United Kingdom,
    • the currency in which remuneration is to be paid while he is working outside the United Kingdom,
    • any additional remuneration payable to him, and any benefits to be provided to or in respect of him, by reason of his being required to work outside the United Kingdom, and
    • any terms and conditions relating to his return to the United Kingdom.
New rules oblige employment tribunals to award compensation to an employee if the employer has not provided written particulars of employment as required unless there are exceptional circumstances which would make an award or increase unjust or inequitable. This is not a free standing right and can only be claimed where the employee is bringing proceedings under specified employment tribunal jurisdictions, including unfair dismissal and all types of discrimination. A tribunal also has the power to confirm or amend particulars.

The compensation will normally be either 2 or 4 times a week's pay (a weeks pay is subject to a cap which is currently £310.00).

It is a criminal offence not to have a written record of the terms of company directors' service contracts, even if the director is the only shareholder in the company.

3. Changes to terms of employment

Negative changes in existing terms of employment are usually made in one of three ways:-

  • by agreement with the employee(s), possibly with a cash "sweetener";
  • by unilateral variation of contract terms (or of works rules applied by the contracts); or
  • by giving required notice to terminate existing contracts and offering new contracts on new terms.

    Choices open to an employee are:-

  • to go along with the employer's proposals;
  • to reject them and quit, perhaps claiming constructive dismissal , or
  • to reject them but continue to work on a without prejudice basis (ie "under protest") on the new terms, reserving all rights, negotiating if possible and ultimately bringing court or Tribunal proceedings if agreement cannot be reached.

    Changes should be discussed with employees in advance. Failure to do so will normally be unreasonable and be held against the employer in any court or Tribunal proceedings.

    The basic rule is that a unilateral change to terms and conditions of employment made by an employer without agreement of the employee is generally a breach of contract. In serious cases this can give the employee the right to resign and claim constructive dismissal. The civil courts will have jurisdiction as well as (or instead of) an employment tribunal and the civil courts have greater powers than tribunals to award compensation in breach of contract cases.

    Even a clause agreed by an employee giving the employer the right to make unilateral changes to contract terms or works rules will not give the employer a total freedom and an employee may still be able to claim constructive dismissal if the employer makes significant changes. Employers should take expert legal advice.

    Changes in terms of employment must be notified to employees within one month, or sometimes sooner if overseas work is involved. Employees should be made fully aware of, and accept, any detrimental changes to their terms of employment if the changes are to be legally binding. Acceptance can be inferred by the employee's conduct. (eg continuing to work without objecting to the change. A variation will not be binding if there is no consideration).

    If an employee does not accept the changes then provided they were reasonable changes his refusal to accept them might amount to "some other substantial reason" which if sufficiently important could be a potentially fair reason for dismissing the employee.

4. Age discrimination update

The main provisions of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, SI 2006/1031:

  • make direct and indirect age discrimination illegal in employment unless objectively justified (including terms of recruitment, job-advertising, promotion and training;
  • make all retirement ages under 65 illegal unless objectively justified;
  • remove the current upper age limits for unfair dismissal rights and statutory redundancy payments
  • require employers to give proper consideration to an employee's request to continue working beyond retirement; and
  • require employers to give written notice to employees at least 6 months in advance of their intended retirement date.

Benefits which depend on length of service requirements of 5 years or less or which recognise and reward loyalty and experience and motivate staff will continue to be lawful and there will be exemptions for many age-based rules in occupational pension schemes. The regulations will not affect the age at which people can claim their state pension.

All age limits are being removed for statutory sick pay, statutory maternity pay, statutory adoption pay and statutory paternity pay.

5. Post-termination restrictive covenants

Generally, restrictive covenants are clearly in restraint of trade and so are contrary to public policy. This principle conflicts with another that contracts freely entered into should be enforced.

The courts resolve the resulting conflict of public policy principles by enforcing restrictive covenants after employment has ended only if they go no further than is reasonably required to protect the legitimate business interests (including goodwill, customer lists and trade secrets) of the employer.

Restrictive covenant clauses should usually be drafted so that each part can be construed independently of any other parts and this should be expressed to be the intention of the parties. It is also important that restrictive covenants should be "tailormade" to suit the individual circumstances of the particular individual.

There is a general rule that where an employer has behaved so badly towards his employee that the employee can treat his employment contract as at an end then, because the contract has been ended by his own fault, the employer cannot usually enforce any post-termination restrictive covenants it may have contained.

6. Summary of qualifying periods for employment rights

The following statutory employment rights are subject to completion of the following qualifying periods of continuous employment:

  • Unfair dismissal - normally one year but this is reduced to none in certain cases,  notably cases in which dismissal is automatically unfair.
  • Sex, Race and Disability discrimination - none
  • Written statement of reasons for dismissal - one year
  • Redundancy pay - two years.
  • Time off to look for other work or for training if under notice for redundancy - two years.
  • Written statement of employment terms - one month.
  • Written statement of changes in terms - one month.
  • Itemised pay statements - none
  • Pay if suspended on certain medical grounds - one month
  • Statutory Sick Pay - none
  • Time off for public duties - none
  • Not to be unjustifiable disciplined by a Trade Union - none
  • Not to be refused employment because of TU membership or non-membership or be victimised because of TU membership, non-membership or activities - none
  • Time off for TU officials for TU duties - none
  • Time off for TU activities - none
  • Right to job back after ''old style'' maternity leave - two years
  • Right to ''new style'' maternity leave - none
  • Statutory Maternity Pay - 26 weeks
  • Time off for ante-natal care - none
  • DSS redundancy pay on employer's insolvency - two years
  • DSS holiday etc pay on employer's insolvency - none
 
Topical Employment Law Issues Print

One of the most radical recent developments affecting employers and employees is the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004 which came into force on 1st October 2004. Under these Regulations all employers regardless of size are obliged to operate minimum statutory grievance and disciplinary procedures and the small employer exemption from the need to provide employees with details of such procedures is abolished.

Employees generally have to go through the statutory grievance procedures as a precondition of being allowed to bring claims to an Employment Tribunal (ET). Likewise, employers are required to go through formal disciplinary/dismissal procedures (including for example redundancy) before dismissing staff, failing which dismissals will invariably be automatically unfair. In a recent case dealt with by the firm, the Employment Tribunal ruled that if the claim is that the dismissal was unfair on the grounds of unlawful discrimination, the disciplinary procedure applies but the employee does not additionally have to initiate a grievance about the discrimination aspect. However the employee must then restrict his claim to unfair dismissal tainted by discrimination. Any other complaints about discrimination would have to be subjected to by the employee to the internal grievance procedure before the ET would have jurisdiction to consider them.

In most cases the procedures are straightforward. Step 1 is a written statement, usually in the form of a letter, setting out the employee grievance or employer disciplinary or redundancy concern. Following the step 1 letter there should be a meeting which is Step 2, after which, the employer must inform the employee of his decision and of the right of appeal. Step 3 comprises the appeal meeting if the employee notifies a wish to appeal.

Employees can suffer severe penalties by failing to use the statutory procedures in that an Employment Tribunal may not consider their claims at all. Likewise, if employers fail to use the statutory procedures they will be penalised by rulings of automatic unfair dismissals and increases in the compensation awards by up to 50 percent.

In cases of constructive dismissals, that is where the employee quits and claims that he was forced to do so by the employer’s fundamental breach of contract, the dismissal procedures are inapplicable but the employee is still required to try to initiate the grievance procedure before referring to the Employment Tribunal even though the employment will already have ended at that time.

Dealing with some specific questions raised by members of the BSBC:

1. “What are the changes with regard to taking people on a probationary period”?

There are no specific changes in the law relating to probationers for normal employments without specific regulations such as those affecting the police or armed forces.

Employers are entitled to employ staff on a probationary basis during which employment may be ended by either party usually on a week’s notice expiring at any time. The probationary period however is subject to the normal law relating to unfair dismissal which usually applies after 12 months continuous service and to the laws against discrimination which apply from the job advertisement, interview stage through to day 1 of the employment onwards. The effect of the latter is that employers which dismiss employees for reasons which are unlawfully discriminatory will be liable for compensation for claims of unfair dismissal/discrimination irrespective of the probation period.

Probationary periods tend to be useful firstly for making plain to employees and employers, that the initial employment is for a trial period and secondly for ensuring that during that trial period, any contractual notice that would normally be required to be given for example two or three months or more in the cases of schools would not be applicable during the probationary period when one week’s notice will be substituted. The latter advantage continues to apply up to two year’s service although the employee will have the right not to be unfairly dismissed irrespective of the length of notice given after 12 months.

2. “What are the Regulations regarding jury service and what and how can you claim people’s time”?

Surprisingly, no statute specifically requires an employer to allow employees time off work for jury service although with effect from 6th April 2005, dismissing an employee for taking time off work for jury service would in most cases render the employer liable for an automatic unfair dismissal decision. Even before that an employer might be liable to be fined for contempt of court for refusing absence for jury service. Employers are not required to pay the salaries of such absent staff but many do. No payment to employers is made by the state or court in respect of staff absent on jury service but individual jurors are entitled to a payment for loss of earnings and benefits. Application forms for affected employees are available at the court or where the jury service is served.

3. “What to look out for when employing freelancers and sub contractors”?

This is the most difficult and controversial of the question put to Richard Fowler in advance of this meeting. The key points for employers to consider are first regardless of what may be agreed in writing between the individual and the employer about self employment, their status may be interpreted by Employment Tribunals when looking also at the work actually done by the individual, as creating an employment contract. This Employment Tribunal’s interpretation of employment may apply even in cases where the Inland Revenue accept that the individual is self employed. In such cases, the employer may become liable to pay national insurance/PAYE for the individual. Specific provision is made for the construction industry. Under the construction industry scheme, a flat deduction on account of tax and NI contribution is made from payments by employers to any self-employed sub contractors in the trade who do not have gross payments certificates. The government has made available new information packs for the scheme which was updated in April 2007.

The criteria for deciding whether someone is an employee or not were detailed as long ago as 1968 in the case of Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Limited v Ministry of Pensions and NI (1968 1 ALL ER 433). For the worker to be an employee he must be paid; have agreed expressly or impliedly to carry out at least some of the work personally that is, with his own hands and the employer must exercise some degree over the worker’s work. Work permits and immigration are also possible issues to consider in this area. Asylum seekers have no automatic right to work in the UK and must obtain specific permission to do so from the Immigration & Nationality Directorate, Lunar House, 40 Wellesley Road, Croydon, CR9 2BY or a Regional Office. The Home Office has wide powers to require employers to supply information about employees who are suspected of having committed immigration related offences.

4. “What changes affect a company when they employ five or more staff”?

On 6th May 2003 the EC made recommendations regarding the definition of micro, small and medium sized employees along the following lines: Micro – are less than 10 employees and less than 2million Euro balance total or turnover.

Small companies are those with fewer than 50 employees and less than 10million Euro balance total or turnover and other small employers are those with fewer than 250 employees and less than 43million Euro balance total or 50million Euro turnover.

Employees do not include apprentices or students for those purposes.

Statutory maternity, paternity and adoption pay can be reclaimed by small employers. For the purposes of SMP a small employee is defined as one whose NI contributions do not exceed £45,000 for the qualifying tax year.

The small employers exemption as regards maternity and adoption leave has been removed as from 1st April 2007.

Small employers are exempted from some health and safety documentation rules.

There is a general unfair dismissal requirement for courts and Employment Tribunals to take into account “the size and administrative resources of the employers undertaking” when considering the fairness of dismissal.

Under the pre-April 2007 law relating to “maternity and adoption” leave, the provisions making dismissals automatically unfair if an employee was not allowed to return to work after maternity or adoption leave did not apply to small employers who satisfied certain conditions. Small employers in that context meant five or fewer employees.

Employers’ Liability Insurance: With effect from 28th February 2005 companies which only have one employee and that employee also owned 50% or more of the issued share capital are exempted from the requirement to have employers’ liability compulsory insurance.

Disability discrimination exemption for small employers was removed on 1st October 2004.

Likewise, the special rules for small employers in respect of disciplinary and grievance procedure came to an end on 1st October 2004.

Small employers can pay PAYE and Class 1 national insurance contributions quarterly whereas larger employers must pay monthly.

Industrial training levy in the construction and engineering industry for the purposes of raising money towards the expenses of relevant training boards do not apply to smaller employers.

Trade Union Recognition: The rules requiring employers to recognise trade unions in some circumstances only apply where at least 21 workers are involved.

Stakeholder Pensions: Employers with fewer than five employees are exempt from employer’s obligations under the “stakeholder pensions” scheme notably the obligation to facilitate employees’ access to a scheme. Employers increasing staff to five or more have three months from the date of taking on a fifth employee to comply with the regulations.

Companies with fewer than 15 employees are exempt from the requirements of the Information and Consultation of Employees’ Regulations 2004 – the relevant threshold will be 50 employees from 6th April 2008 (currently 100).

Employers with fewer than 5 employees are exempt from record keeping rules as regards certain fire safety regulations.

Special rules for small firms under Redundancy and Sex Discrimination Legislation were abolished some years ago.

 
Charities Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005 Print

The purpose of this note is to provide background information and details for charities that undertake charitable activities in Scotland.

Background

In May 2001 the Scottish Charity Law Review Commission published a report which made recommendations for the reform of charity law and regulation in Scotland. Most of the proposed measures have now become legislation by way of the Charities Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005 (‘the Act’).

The legislation has included the establishment of the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR). Prior to this there existed the Scottish Charities Office which worked in conjunction with the Inland Revenue in regulating charities that operated in Scotland.

Previously, any applications for registration or recognition as a charity were made to the Scottish Inland Revenue charity unit – IR Charities. Those charities that were registered in England and Wales with the Charity Commission were under no obligation to register in Scotland.

The new provisions

Under the new legislation a charity that is undertaking significant operations in Scotland and requires recognised charitable status, is under an obligation to register in Scotland. Such applications should be made to the OSCR and the obligations falls on the charity.

All significant operations by charities in Scotland are to be regulated by the OSCR. This requirement will apply even if the charity is already registered in England and Wales.

Whether or not a charity should register in Scotland will depend on whether or not they fit a certain criteria. This includes:

  • Does the charity own or occupy any land or premises in Scotland?
  • Does the charity carry out any activities in any office, shop or similar premises in Scotland?

If the above applies to the charity then it should register in Scotland with the OSCR.

In determining whether or not the criteria for registration applies to a non Scottish charity, the OSCR will also examine factors such as whether or not the charity pays rates in Scotland and/or claims relief on non domestic rates from a local authority. Other factors will include whether or not the charity holds open meetings in Scotland or charges for events in Scotland.

The OSCR have said that they will build up a series of case studies which will form the basis of their assessment.

Subject to the application (or not) of the above criteria, in some cases if you are merely fundraising in Scotland you might not have to register. However you should note that you might require a licence or have a formal agreement in place with a professional fund raiser. This would depend on the type of fundraising you are undertaking.

If you are already registered as a charity in Scotland you do not have to take any action as you will already have been issued with a Scottish Charity number.

Registering with the OSCR

The new provisions relating to registration will commence from in April 2006. If you believe that your charity falls within the criteria above you should register with the OSCR. The OSCR has stated that cross boarder and UK wide charities will then have a year in which to register with the OSCR.

In considering applications, the OSCR will examine if the charity meets the charity test as outlined in the Act. In this case the charity must be for a charitable purpose and it must demonstrate a public benefit. The charity test in Scotland is slightly different to the one in England and Wales. The OSCR has said that it aims to develop its own reasoning in determining if an organisation is charitable. The OSCR will be providing initial guidance on this point in spring 2006.

In October 2005, the OSCR will be publishing a consultation programme on the time table for registration and believes that cross boarder charities will be invited to register from September 2006 onwards.

Accounts and returns

If a charity is registered in both Scotland and England and Wales, it will be required to produce accounts and returns for both regulators. However, the OSCR has said that it is working closely with the Charity Commission in an effort to streamline the information required.

Excepted charities in England and Wales

This is a concept limited to England and Wales. All charities operating in Scotland that meet the criteria must register with the OSCR.

 

The information provided in this handout is guidance only and is not in anyway meant to be the provision of an opinion or legal advice.

 
Scottish Registration September 2007 Print

The Charities Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005 

Registration of Charities in Scotland and recent developments

The purpose of this note is to provide you with a consolidated summary of events that have recently occurred in regard to registration in Scotland. At the end of the note we set out the present position and the available options.

Background

New provisions requiring English charities to register in Scotland came into force in April 2006 when the Charities Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005 (the Act) was introduced. Under the new legislation, if a charity is undertaking significant operations in Scotland and requires charitable status, it is under an obligation to register with the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR). This requirement applies even if the charity is already registered in England and Wales. In considering applications, OSCR will examine whether the charity meets the charity testas outlined in section 7 of the Act. The test is based on the following four principles:
  1. A body must have only charitable purposes (as listed in section 7 of the Act)
  2. The constitution of the body must not allow its property to be used for noncharitable purposes; must not contain in its constitution express power of direction or control by Ministers; must not be a political party or have as its purpose to advance a political party.
  3. It must provide public benefit in Scotland or elsewhere. In determining whether a body does so, OSCR must have regard to how the benefit to the public compares to any private benefit or any disbenefit that may result from activities of the particular body.
  4. OSCR must have regard to whether there are unduly restrictive conditions on obtaining the benefit the body provides.

Since the legislation was introduced a large number of English and Welsh charities have tried to register in Scotland but have been unsuccessful. The rejections have predominantly occurred because of the difference in the way charitable purposesis defined in Scottish law and English law. Although the definition in both jurisdictions is similar, it is not the same.

Many charitiesgoverning documents include the term charitable purposeseither in their objects clause or in the winding up clause. As the English and Welsh charities were established under English law, OSCR determined that the wording used in the governing documents would be interpreted according to the definition of charitable purposesas set out in English law. This definition, as mentioned above, is slightly different to the one set out in the Scottish legislation.

OSCR has, therefore, rejected applications on the basis of section 7(4)(a) of the 2005 Act which provides a charity will fail the test for registration if:

“…its constitution allows it to distribute or otherwise apply any of its property (on being wound up or at any other time) for a purpose which is not a charitable purpose...

It is important to note that some charities have been able to meet the charitable testas set out in the Scottish Act in relation to their objects but have failed on the basis of the reference to charitable purposes as set out in their dissolution clauses.

During the initial rejections, OSCR suggested the following wording should be included in the governing documents of charities to enable them to meet the registration test:

Throughout this trust deed charitable purposeis a purpose that is regarded as charitable both in the law of England & Wales and the law of Scotland, and the term charitableis to be interpreted in accordance both with the law of England & Wales and the law of Scotland(wording A).

Those charities which had been affected by this problem were given an extension of time to consider how they wished to proceed.

Making amendments to the governing documents

In order to register with OSCR, it seems that the only way forward is to amend the governing documents of those charities that are affected by this problem. In many cases, and particularly those of Religious Order charities whose Trust Deeds are based on the model document drawn up in the 1960s, such amendments can only be made by way of a Scheme and with the consent of the Charity Commission. This is because there is no power of amendment in the Trust Deeds and amendments to charitable purposes must be by way of a Scheme.

We notified the Charity Commission that this would be an issue in regard to some of our clients which operated in Scotland. We also advised them that the amendments suggested by OSCR could only occur by way of a Scheme. The Charity Commission agreed with us and, in March 2007, advised us that they would be meeting with OSCR to discuss the issue of amendments to the objects and dissolution clauses of English and Welsh Charities that wished to register in Scotland.

Following this the Commission suggested that the following wording should be used in the governing documents of English charities wishing to register with OSCR:

“’charitablemeans charitable in accordance with the law of England and Wales provided that it will not include any purpose which is not charitable in accordance with section 7 of the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005. For avoidance of doubt, the system of law governing the constitution is the law of England and Wales. (wording B)

While this wording is acceptable both to the Charity Commission and OSCR the effect is to limit the objects of the charity to those purposes which are charitable in Scotland and those purposes which are charitable in England and Wales. In practice this might be of little consequence to some charities but it does impose fairly specific limitations. The biggest impact will be for those charities that have significant operations outside of England and Wales and Scotland. The legal issue is that the Scottish list of charitable purposes is narrower than that in England and Wales. Whilst this is not of great significance at the moment, the issue could become more of a problem once the Scottish Courts have begun to interpret the Act. This could lead to a wider difference between the laws of the two jurisdictions.

At the end of August 2007, OSCR reconsidered their original suggestion of wording A and provided the following suggestion in addition to wording B (which was still acceptable to them):

Nothing in this constitution shall authorise an application of the property of  the charity for purposes which are not charitable in accordance with Section 7 Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005(wording C)

The suggestion is that wording B will be used where objects clauses are incompatible with the Act and wording C will be used in relation to dissolution clauses. Wording A is to be ignored and is no longer recommended.

 We would suggest that the wording outlined in wording C is even more restrictive than the wording set out in wording B as the effect is to limit the application of the charitys funds on dissolution to those purposes which are relevant only to Scotland.

Options available

We believe that the following options are now open to charities facing this issue:

  1. Establish a separate Scottish charity and make a new application

    A new charity could be established in Scotland to take over the current operations there and this body could then apply to OSCR for registration.

    For the majority of Religious Order charities this does not represent a practical solution as Scotland will generally be administered as part of an English or Irish Province. Operations in Scotland are often relatively limited. Further, there is a legal issue in that Scottish law is narrower than English law. If assets were transferred from an English charity to a Scottish charity, the trustees in England would effectively be saying that those funds would be applied for narrower purposes in future. This goes against the principle of English law that, unless trustees are making a specific decision about spending money, they should not seek to limit their discretion by unnecessarily restricting the purposes for which funds may be applied within the objects laid down in the governing document.

    This also means that the charity will have a separate operation in Scotland and will have to comply with administrative matters there in addition to the administrative matters it complies with in England.

    This route is not recommended unless the charity thinks that it has significant enough operations in Scotland to warrant such a move.

  2. The charity has the option to use the wording B and or wording C as recommended by the Charity Commission and OSCR. However, as we have noted above the use of this wording is likely to restrict the charity’s activities to England and Wales and Scotland, or in the case of wording C, just Scotland.

    The Charity Commission does not appear comfortable with the wording it has agreed with OSCR. This is due to the fact that any charity adopting it will, in effect, be narrowing its purposes to meet Scottish law. As mentioned above, this goes against English law. Charities established in England are subject primarily to the jurisdiction of the English Courts. The situation that has arisen here is a ‘conflict of laws’. Generally, in such cases, the law of the ‘home’ jurisdiction, i.e. England in this case, should prevail.

  3. The charity can seek to amend its constitution but use different wording to that agreed by the Charity Commission and OSCR. Such alternative wording would need to be agreed by both regulators. We would be happy to prepare such wording but anticipate that it could be difficult to come up with a solution that would overcome the problem highlighted above with the current wording on offer and be acceptable to all concerned.

  4. The charity can withdraw its application and refuse to amend its constitution. If you decide to withdraw your application, refuse to amend the constitution and carry on operating in Scotland, OSCR has said that it will refuse to register any such charity. Further, if the charity holds it self out as a charity in Scotland, OSCR will consider this to be a breach of section 13 of the Act which means that the charity cannot call itself a charity in Scotland unless it is registered in Scotland or established under the law of Scotland. OSCR then has the power to take punitive action under section 31 and section 34 of the Act.

    For many Religious Order charities, which do not carry out fundraising activities, it is questionable whether they are holding themselves out as charities in Scotland anyway. Under English law there is a requirement to have registered charity status noted on various documents such as notepaper. Therefore, an English charity needs to observe this requirement. However, an English charity operating in Scotland could include wording such as the following on documents:-

    “Registered as a charity in England & Wales – registered charity number…”

    We do not recommend this course of action if you wish to continue holding yourself out as a charitable organisation in Scotland due to significant fundraising activities or for other reasons.

    The main benefit of charitable status is the tax concessions available. Tax law is still dealt with at UK level so registration with OSCR is not required to continue to benefit from these concessions. If a charity benefits from business rates relief in Scotland the position could be different but we would then anticipate that the operations in Scotland would be significant and this option might not be the best to adopt.

  5. You might decide to withdraw from Scotland and not carry on any operations there. However, you should note that, in the event that you resume operations and continue to hold yourself out as a charity, you will be required to register in Scotland unless you have minor operations or are carrying on low key fundraising in Scotland, in which case you have to make it clear that you are registered as a charity in another jurisdiction.

Conclusion

The process of registering English and Welsh charities with OSCR has become a very difficult issue which was not the intention. Due to the conflict of laws between the two jurisdictions there is no easy answer for charities affected. Each charity clearly needs to consider its own position but Option 4 above may well be the best solution for charities which have few operations in Scotland and which are administered in England and Wales.

 
More Articles...


Page 5 of 6